Jump to content

Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates

   📽️ Media

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
    • Tools that generate image content not present in the original capture should be disclosed. This applies whether the generated area is inside the original frame or beyond it. Examples include Generative Fill and Generative Expand, the Remove tool and Distraction Removal in Photoshop, the Remove mode in Lightroom, Sky Replacement, AI relighting that invents highlights, reflections or shadows, and external generators such as Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, DALL-E or Firefly. Other tools that work in the same way are covered even if they are not listed here, since product names change often.
      • Disclosure is not needed for tools that only process pixels that were already captured: AI denoising such as Lightroom Denoise, DxO or Topaz, sharpening, AI-assisted masks and selections used in the workflow, in-camera HDR and panorama merging, and the heal and clone modes that do not generate content.
      • Describe the generated content on the file description page with the {{Retouched picture}} template. If you are already describing other edits there, add it to that description instead of using a second template.
      • A nomination with undisclosed generated content may be tagged {{FPX}}. If undisclosed generated content is found after promotion, the picture may be delisted.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

AI-generated images

Entirely or substantially AI-generated images are not eligible for featured picture status.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).


Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them.

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. They should be added by, or at the request of, the nominator.

An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== [[File:Foo.jpg|300px]] *{{info}} A short description.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture.
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
Shortcut

File:Western eyed sphinx (58246).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2026 at 18:02:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male western eyed sphinx moth

File:Tesařovská kaple (2026) - night.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2026 at 16:25:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:গ্রামীন বাউত উৎসব, পাবনা, বাংলাদেশ (DSC03374).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2026 at 15:55:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A group of fishermen carrying fishing gear on their shoulders set off towards Beel to participate in the Baut festival, a rural traditional festival held during the winter season, Pabna, Bangladesh.

File:Ghepan Lake, above Sissu, Himachal Pradesh, India.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2026 at 12:06:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ghepan Lake, a glacial lake above the town of Sissu in the northern Indian state of Himachal Pradesh.

File:Open wing Basking of Graphium antiphates (Cramer, 1775) - Five-bar Swordtail (1) WLB.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2026 at 10:48:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Abduvohid Nematov 13.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2026 at 09:54:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Association football goalkeeper of Uzbekistan national football team Abduvohid Nematov
Alvesgaspar, info added. Umarxon III (talk) 19:38, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply

File:Parenpente - Plage d'Hatainville.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2026 at 07:41:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paragliding at Cap de Carteret, Hatainville beach in Normandy

File:Eclipse-totale-2026-couronne-Luc-Viatour.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2026 at 07:07:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Total solar eclipse in Spain on August 12, 2016 at 8:36 PM

File:2021-09-03 01 North view of Portland Head Light (1791), at Cape Elizabeth, Maine.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2026 at 20:55:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

North view of Portland Head Light, Maine USA

File:"A full hand" LCCN2001699778-restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2026 at 20:39:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"A full hand" lithograph

File:Pont du Gard, France.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2026 at 17:16:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Sunflower in Zaryadye Park, Moscow - July 2026.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2026 at 17:11:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Slate outcrop Porto Covo August 2026-7.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2026 at 16:39:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Slate outcrop

File:Florian Lipowitz (team Red Bull–Bora–hansgrohe) winning Stage 5 (2026 Tour of Slovenia).jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2026 at 16:45:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Philippine brown shrike (Lanius cristatus lucionensis) on coral tree (Erythrina variegata) Xindian.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2026 at 16:41:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Philippine brown shrike (Lanius cristatus lucionensis) on coral tree (Erythrina variegata)

File:Balephi River in Balephi Rural Municipality.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2026 at 06:08:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Cathedral of Talin with reflection.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2026 at 23:54:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cathedral of Talin (Armenia) with reflection in water. May 2020.

File:Cape Elizabeth, Maine, USA (51307173571).jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2026 at 23:24:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portland Head Light at Cape Elizabeth, Maine, USA, September 2019. (And I think it's Ram Island Ledge Light Station at the horizon.)

File:Nebel zieht über die Rhön.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2026 at 15:15:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fog drifts across the Rhön Mountains. View from the Himmeldunkberg looking west

File:Spiti River Right Bank Vista Himachal Jun18 D72 7645.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2026 at 08:28:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spiti River gorge, Himachal, India

File:Bloem van een haagwinde (Calystegia sepium). 29-07-2026 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2026 at 04:24:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bloem van een haagwinde (Calystegia sepium).
  • @2015 Michael 2015:  Comment Thank you for your comments on this photo. It is new to me that an excellent (FP) photo of a flower must be taken in sunlight. Most of my stacked macro photos of flowers (with an FP star) are deliberately photographed in the shade with even light. Otherwise, the final result of the stacking fails for me. I have brightened up this photo a bit; perhaps you will like it better now.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    How do you understand "from my point of view"? I never said something like "must be" (= is a rule). I wrote my perspective / opinion. Other users are writing "I miss the wow effect", it matches here too. Your picture is already selected as QI and that matches. From my perspective too much good (= not excellent) pictures gets selected as FP. You have still a good chance that other users disagree to my opinion, i.e. my voice will probably not change a promotion to FP. ~~~~ 2015 Michael 2015 (talk) 07:30, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Support A very simple and accomplished photo of a common flower. Of course, photographing flowers (and insects, by the way) with direct sunlight is to be avoided, especially when they are white. Quite often I use my own shadow to prevent the situation. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:55, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply

File:Кеклики.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2026 at 02:02:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two chukar partridges. Kenderli-Kayasan reserve zone. Karakiya District, Mangystau Region, Kazakhstan.

File:প্রবারণা পূর্ণিমায় আলোকরশ্মি শান্তির প্রার্থনায় মগ্ন শ্রমণগণ (00001957).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 16:04:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A group of newly ordained Buddhist śramaṇas performing the traditional lamp-lighting ritual on Prabarana Purnima, Bangladesh.

File:Faces of Gajan (ABC5240).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 16:01:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Faces of Gajan, Gajan Festival, West Bengal, India.

File:Споменик на НОБ кај Дабница.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 11:53:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A monument dedicated to the victims in the Dabnica massacre during World War II near the village of Dabnica

File:Комбајн кај Бараково.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 11:31:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A combine harvester of the brand Fiatagri while harvesting crops near the village of Barakovo

File:Tesařovská kaple (2026).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 10:51:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Evangelical chapel in Kořenov, Czech Republic

File:Меловые чинки во впадине Каракия.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 22:35:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Karakiya depression view. Karakiya-Karakol sanctuary, Mangystau Region, Kazakhstan

File:Aguja de mar (Syngnathoides biaculeatus), Nosy Be, Madagascar, 2025-09-20, DD 84.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 18:22:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alligator pipefish (Syngnathoides biaculeatus), Nosy Be, Madagascar

File:2026 Dinagyang Festival Iloilo City 07.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 16:45:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Blue-throated Barbet in Rabindra Sarobar March 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 09:37:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue-throated Barbet (Psilopogon asiaticus)

File:153 Swallow-tailed bee-eater in flight in Etosha National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 07:22:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swallow-tailed bee-eater in flight in Etosha National Park

File:DSC06447 EAF Construction Site, voestalpine Steelworks, Leoben-Donawitz, 2026.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 19:13:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Construction site of the new electric steel plant in Leoben-Donawitz (Austria) which will include two electric arc furnaces for the production of crude steel from steel scrap.

File:DSC03121 Sinter Plant Chimney at Day, voestalpine Steelworks, Leoben-Donawitz, 2026-02.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 19:07:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Distinctive sinter-plant chimney of the voestalpine integrated steel plant in Leoben-Donawitz.

File:R305 temporary bridge 2019.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 14:56:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A temporary bridge on the Japan National Route 305 to bypass a July 2018 landslide in Fukui; construction was completed in October 2018.

File:Kalvebod Bølge - Bølgen 5.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 09:36:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bølgen, an open-air electronic music event on Kalvebod Bølge, Copenhagen
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:48, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 07:00:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rusty-margined flycatcher in Encontro das Águas State Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:45, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Tyrannidae#Genus : Myiozetetes

File:Rufous Babbler in Mahabaleshwar August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 05.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 06:02:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rufous Babbler (Argya subrufa)

File:Tufted puffin (Fratercula cirrhata) Tofino.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 15:48:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tufted puffin (Fratercula cirrhata)

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 21:56:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nave of St. Lorenz Basilica in Kempten (Allgäu), Bavaria, looking east towards the choir: on the left the pulpit of red-brown scagliola (1685), opposite it the crucifix with Mary and John, in the background the side altars at the choir entrance and the high altar with an altarpiece of the Assumption of Mary
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany

File:Lagarto (Zonosaurus rufipes), Parque Nacional de Lokobe, Nosy Be, Madagascar, 2025-09-21, DD 80.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 21:00:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-legged girdled lizard (Zonosaurus rufipes), Lokobe National Park, Nosy Be, Madagascar

File:Dülmen, Weddern, Sonnenblumen -- 2026 -- 2005.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 18:26:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunflower field in the Weddern hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Thanks for your review. Sometimes I'm not sure if it's just the photo's resolution that's causing this effect. Nevertheless, I took special care to improve the sharpness and uploaded a new version of the photo. -- XRay 💬 07:20, 22 August 2026 (UTC)reply

File:Wadi Rum Desert 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 01:24:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wadi Rum Desert

File:Black-headed gull (05593).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 21:10:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a black-headed gull

File:MingGuangzong1.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 16:20:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Taichang Emperor

File:MingShenzong1.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 16:19:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wanli Emperor

File:Topography of Cadlao Lagoon.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 14:47:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cadlao Lagoon

File:Colour celebration in Holi festival.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 14:31:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Holi festival
 Question Why is only that low resolution given? Otherwise it would be a very good photo --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:35, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply

File:A powerful display of culture, courage, and speed.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 10:13:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Catedral de San Sarkis, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 65.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 03:03:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Sarkis Cathedral, Tehran, Iran

File:Panorama-Almkopf-Ammergauer-Alpen-Wettersteingebirge-Zugspitze-Lechtaler-Alpen-2026-beschriftet.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 23:26:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama shot of Ammergauer Alps with Zugspitze and a lot of other mountains
  •  Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 23:26, 15 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 09:43, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Comment I would prefer the image without the labels on the mountains. The labels/arrows should all be a consistent format/layout. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    I gave this quite a bit of thought beforehand: same font, two colors (one for labels with sky in background brighter for darker background e.g. the grass covered peaks inside the landscape. One larger label for the Zugspitze - highest mountain of Germany. I made a lot of effort to realize the labels in a typographically pleasant way. For those who like an unedited version I linked the version without label and non-retouched mast in the image descrption. Tuxyso (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Support I prefer it with the labels, it feels more educational and useful. There is a version without labels, if anyone would like to nominate that as an alternative. LetmeEditit (talk) 13:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Support --Maryliflower (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Oppose See Commons:Watermarks and Commons:Image annotations. Burned-in text is not the standard. Additional meta-data outside the image is the standard and improves our ability to use media across all Wikipedia projects. When labels are rendered directly into the pixels, they are not programmatically readable by assistive technologies (screen readers), and do not adapt to users needing high-contrast assistance. -- E bailey (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Thanks for raising this, but I think neither of the two linked pages actually supports the oppose. Commons:Watermarks explicitly defines watermarks as content that is not part of the creative work itself and serves to assert authorship/copyright. Peak labels are informational content and part of the work, comparable to labels on a map. Besides, that page is a proposed guideline, not policy. Commons:Image annotations, in turn, explicitly lists "identification of places/objects/locations in panoramic photographs" as a desirable type of information. It governs the annotation tool, it does not prohibit rendered labels.
    On the practical side: image notes simply do not work for a 38,000 px panorama. They are only visible on the scaled-down file page preview, not in the Media Viewer, not in ZoomViewer, not in article thumbnails, not in downloaded copies. Precisely at full resolution, where peak identification matters, notes are invisible. So there is, realistically, no alternative way to offer a labeled high-resolution panorama on Commons — the only "alternative" would be not to create such panoramas at all, which would be a loss, considering the substantial work that goes into them.
    Regarding accessibility: the file has a detailed bilingual description naming all major peaks, which is fully machine-readable (including structured data). That, not pixels or image notes (which screen readers cannot read either), is what assistive technology relies on. Current screen readers additionally perform OCR on images: VoiceOver includes built-in Text Recognition (iOS 14+), and JAWS offers Convenient OCR and Picture Smart AI. And for anyone preferring an unlabeled version for reuse, translation, or high-contrast adaptation it is linked under "other versions" at full resolution. Nothing is lost; the labeled version simply adds value, the same way a labeled map does. Tuxyso (talk) 17:41, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    I would support the version without labels. It has broader use and value. E bailey (talk) 18:33, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Support -- In my opinion, the two versions work best together, just like twins. Je-str (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Support The labels add genuine encyclopedic value by identifying the peaks directly in the panorama. They are informational content, not a watermark. The digital modifications, including the added labels and removal of the radio mast, are fully documented in the retouching template, with the original version linked. The unlabelled full-resolution version is also available, so both versions complement each other very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:15, 17 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Weak oppose IMHO there is a reasonable middle ground here. As mentioned above, the burned-in text detracts from an otherwise wonderful panorama and limits its usefulness by turning it into a specifically encyclopedic illustration. The labels are useful information, but that information does not necessarily need to be part of the pixels themselves. Commons already provides ways to associate information with particular parts of an image, annotations and, more usefully, Structured Data with depicts (P180) and relative position within image (P2677). That would allow the individual peaks to be identified in a machine-readable and multilingual way while keeping the original panorama clean and reusable. I would prefer the unlabelled panorama as the featured version, and keeping the labelled file as a useful derivative. The existing unlabelled version could also be added here as an Alternative, allowing voters to choose between the two. I also don't think Commons:Watermarks is relevant in this case because these are informational labels rather than authorship or copyright markings. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Thanks for the review! Could you show me an example of how you'd depict the individual peaks? Maybe we could even combine both ideas — Wikidata plus labels? Tuxyso (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Thanks, yes, I think combining both approaches could actually be a good solution. What I had in mind was adding a depicts (P180) statement for each identifiable peak in the file's Structured Data, with relative position within image (P2677) as a qualifier indicating its position. There is already a Commons example using this approach for multiple landmarks File:Werner Haberkorn - Centro da cidade.jpg, where individual buildings are identified with P180 and P2677. This would not visually replace your labels, of course, at present the structured positions are not rendered as labels over the image, so I can see the value of keeping the labelled derivative as well. The advantage is that the peak identities would additionally become machine-readable and multilingual, while the unlabelled panorama is available for unrestricted reuse Wilfredor (talk) 21:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Thanks for the hint to mark peaks in the structured data (personally I currently have 0,1% knowhow about Wikidata). Currently this approach is imho for me only of theoretical nature because the marks are not translated into visuals marks directly on the photo. Probably a combination of both could be interesting for future panoramas. Direct labeling plus structured data in ONE photo. What do you think? Another question: Is there a way to automate the generation of such structured data? If it works only 100% manually the benefit for adding this seems too low. The best case would be: An automatic labeling tool which generates the strucured data and a rendering in the software which generates labels based on the information. Tuxyso (talk) 06:46, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Support I like the names inside the image, as long as the original image is linked. More is not needed. -- -donald- (talk) 09:01, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Support per donald and others. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Weak support though I would prefer the clean version for FP, this is also fine. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:45, 23 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •  Comment Zooming in, the bottom part of the 'rectangle' part of the arrow is seen through the 'point' of the arrow. This is visible as two small points on either side of the bottom of every arrow. This bugs me a lot. --Qwaabza (talk) 03:25, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    ✓ Done Thanks, User:Qwaabza for spotting this! You were right, I have overseen it. What bugs me even more: This is a long-standing Photoshop Line Tool issue, documented in Adobe's own community since 2021. Increasing the arrowhead width from 3 px to 5 px fixes it; I have corrected all arrows accordingly. Please take another look (could take some time until the Wikimedia proxy is updated). Tuxyso (talk) 06:37, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply

File:Ушастая сова.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 15:28:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Long-eared owl in Mangyshlak botanical garden. Aqtau, Mangystau Region, Kazakhstan.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 09:20:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Slate outcrop
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 08:21:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Morning shot of Ponoviče Castle above Sava valley, Slovenia
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2026 (UTC)reply
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Slovenia


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Wed 19 Aug → Mon 24 Aug
Thu 20 Aug → Tue 25 Aug
Fri 21 Aug → Wed 26 Aug
Sat 22 Aug → Thu 27 Aug
Sun 23 Aug → Fri 28 Aug
Mon 24 Aug → Sat 29 Aug

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Sat 15 Aug → Mon 24 Aug
Sun 16 Aug → Tue 25 Aug
Mon 17 Aug → Wed 26 Aug
Tue 18 Aug → Thu 27 Aug
Wed 19 Aug → Fri 28 Aug
Thu 20 Aug → Sat 29 Aug
Fri 21 Aug → Sun 30 Aug
Sat 22 Aug → Mon 31 Aug
Sun 23 Aug → Tue 01 Sep
Mon 24 Aug → Wed 02 Sep

Closing nominations manually

The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.

  1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
    • Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
      {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
      (You can leave the gallery parameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add the alternative=xxx parameter with the name of the selected image between the gallery and the sig parameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.)
    • Edit the title of the nomination and add featured or not featured after the link – for example:
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
      becomes
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
    • Save your edit.
  2. If it is featured:
    1. Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    2. Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
    3. Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nomination Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}} You also need the com-nom parameter if the image gets renamed.
      • If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance, {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    4. Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
    5. Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
      File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.)
      • The Title should be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg).
      • The x in {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}} should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively.
      • If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
        File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
        Replace the Z in (Z files) by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead of File:xxxxx.jpg and for the title.
    6. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
      == Set Promoted to FP ==
      <gallery>
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      </gallery>
      {{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}      , using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
    7. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator.
    8. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
  3. Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a <noinclude>...</noinclude> section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:
    1. A category for the month and year, like Category:August 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
    2. A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
    3. A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
    4. If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
  4. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
    • To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
    • Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}} or: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}.
    • Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.

Closing a delisting nomination

  1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
    {{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg)
  2. Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add delisted or not delisted after the image title; for example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
  4. Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
  5. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
  6. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Archiving a withdrawn nomination

If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=1190052133"